THE PERCEPTUAL FRAGMENTATION OF UNSTABILIZED IMAGES.WALKER P.1976; QUART. J. EXPER. PSYCHOL.; G.B.; DA. 1976; VOL. 28; NO 1; PP. 35-45; BIBL. 32 REF.Article

Effects of stimulus change on the electrodermal orienting responseSIDDLE, D. A. T; REMINGTON, B; CHURCHILL, M et al.Biological psychology. 1984, Vol 18, Num 1, pp 33-39, issn 0301-0511Article

THE INFLUENCE OF ACUTE BLOOD VOLUME CHANGES ON PLASMA RENIN ACTIVITY IN MANHESSE B; NIELSEN I; RING LARSEN H et al.1978; SCAND. J. CLIN. LAB. INVEST.; NOR; DA. 1978; VOL. 38; NO 2; PP. 155-161; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF "BELOW-ZERO" HABITATION ON THE ELECTRODERMAL ORIENTING RESPONSE OF A TEST STIMULUS.STEPHENSON D; SIDDLE DAT.1976; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 10-15; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

TOWARD THE SPECIFICATION OF HYPOTHESIS DOMAINS AND EINSTELLUNG.LANE DM; MCDANIEL JR; BLEICHFELD BE et al.1976; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARNG MEM.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 2; NO 4; PP. 489-496; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

ASYMPTOTIC REVERSAL LEARNING IN PIGEONS: MECHANISM FOR REDUCING INHIBITION.WOODARD WT; BITTERMAN ME.1976; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., ANIMAL BEHAV. PROCESS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 2; NO 1; PP. 57-66; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

ON THE ANALYSIS OF CHANGE IN THE OPTIC ARRAY.GIBSON JJ.1977; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWED.; DA. 1977; VOL. 18; NO 3; PP. 161-163; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

PERCEPTION OF GROWTH: A GEOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF HOW DIFFERENT STYLES OF CHANGE ARE DISTINGUISHEDMARK LS; TODD JT; SHAW RE et al.1981; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 4; PP. 855-868; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

VOCAL REGISTER "SHIFT" IDENTIFICATION IN A MODIFIED BREATHING ATMOSPHEREMCGLONE RE; BROWN WS JR.1981; J. ACOUST. SOC. AM.; ISSN 0001-4966; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 69; NO 2; PP. 597-600; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

THE EFFECT ON FORM PERCEPTION OF CHANGE OF ORIENTATION IN THE THIRD DIMENSIONROCK I; DI VITA J; BARBEITO R et al.1981; J. EXP. PSYCHOL., HUM. PERCEPT. PERFORM.; ISSN 0096-1523; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 7; NO 4; PP. 719-732; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF INTENSITY OF THE PREEXPOSED STIMULUS ON SUBSEQUENT CONDITIONING.LANTZ AE.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 4; PP. 381-383; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIALS TO UPREDICTABLE SHIFTS IN PITCH.FORD JM; ROTH WT; KOPELL BS et al.1976; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 13; NO 1; PP. 32-39; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

SUBPROBLEM ANALYSIS OF DISCRIMINATION LEARNING: STIMULUS CHOICE AND RESPONSE LATENCY.KULIG JW; TIGHE TJ.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 4; PP. 377-380; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

A DEVELOPMENTAL CHANGE OF STRATEGIES IN REVERSAL SHIFT PROCESS.MARUNO S.1975; JAP. PSYCHOL. RES.; JAP.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 4; PP. 167-173; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

Volatile visual representations: Failing to detect changes in recently processed informationBECKER, Mark W; PASHLER, Harold.Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2002, Vol 9, Num 4, pp 744-750, issn 1069-9384, 7 p.Article

Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruptionSIMONS, Daniel J; FRANCONERI, Steven L; REIMER, Rebecca L et al.Perception (London. Print). 2000, Vol 29, Num 10, pp 1143-1154, issn 0301-0066Article

The Influence of Temporal Stimulus Changes on Speech-Evoked Potentials Revealed by Approximations of Tone-Evoked WaveformsBURGER, Martin; HOPPE, Ulrich; LOHSCHELLER, Jörg et al.Ear and hearing. 2009, Vol 30, Num 1, pp 16-22, issn 0196-0202, 7 p.Article

Toupee or not toupee? The role of instructional set, centrality, and relevance in change blindnessPEARSON, Pauline M; SCHAEFER, Evelyn G.Visual cognition. 2005, Vol 12, Num 8, pp 1528-1543, issn 1350-6285, 16 p.Article

Detection and identification of change in naturalistic scenesMONDY, S; COLTHEART, V.Visual cognition. 2000, Vol 7, Num 1-3, pp 281-296, issn 1350-6285Article

Sweep-induced acceleration in loudness change and the bias for rising intensitiesTEGHTSOONIAN, Robert; TEGHTSOONIAN, Martha; CANEVET, Georges et al.Perception & psychophysics. 2005, Vol 67, Num 4, pp 699-712, issn 0031-5117, 14 p.Article

Visual reaction time for chromaticity changes at constant luminance in different color representation systemsJIMENEZ DEL BARCO, L; JIMENEZ, J. R; RUBINO, M et al.Journal of optics. 1996, Vol 27, Num 5, pp 233-239, issn 0150-536XArticle

The siren song of implicit change detectionMITROFF, Stephen R; SIMONS, Daniel J; FRANCONERI, Steven L et al.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance. 2002, Vol 28, Num 4, pp 798-815, issn 0096-1523Article

Change in feature space is not necessary for the flash-lag effectBACHMANN, Talis; PODER, Endel.Vision research (Oxford). 2001, Vol 41, Num 9, pp 1103-1106, issn 0042-6989Article

Detection of stimulus change: the hypothetical roles of visual transient responsesSTELMACH, L. B; BOURASSA, C. M; DILOLLO, V et al.Perception & psychophysics. 1984, Vol 35, Num 3, pp 245-255, issn 0031-5117Article

Do mudsplashes induce tactile change blindness?GALLACE, Alberto; TAN, Hong Z; SPENCE, Charles et al.Perception & psychophysics. 2007, Vol 69, Num 4, pp 477-486, issn 0031-5117, 10 p.Article